VASUMATHI – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRIYANI MADHAVI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE short question that arises for consideration in this revision petition is -Whether the order passed by the learned City Civil Judge transferring the petition pending before him to the Family Court is valid and proper.
( 2 ) THE facts are these: Smt. Vasumathi, the petitioner herein, on the death of her husband Raman, approached the City Civil Court by filing an application dated 30-8-1986 under S. 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short the Act of 1925) seeking for issuance of a Succession Certificate in her favour in respect of the estate left behind by her husband. She impleaded in her application one Chandriyani Madhavi, step-sister of her husband.>
( 3 ) AFTER issuing notices and after publishing the matter in a news paper, the matter was set down for evidence and as submitted by the leanred counsel, the evidence was almost at the completion stage.
( 4 ) IN the meantime, one Janki claiming to be the wife of deceased Raman also filed an application under O. 1, R. 10, C. P. C. , seeking permission of the Court to get herself impleaded as a party to the application of the petitioner Vasumathi. The Court allowed the application, permitted he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.