SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 147

N.VENKATACHALA, S.A.HAKEEM
CANARA BANK RELIEF – Appellant
Versus
WELFARE SOCIETY – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE appeals are preferred by petitioners in Miscellaneous Cases Nos. 10087/89 and 10078/89 against the common order dated 22-9-1989 made in seven clubbed cases by the Court of XIX Additional City Civil Judge ("the Court of City Civil Judge"), Bangalore, directing return of the applications filed by them under sub-s. (4) of S. 9 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 ("the Act"), as per R. 10 of O. VII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, at the same time requiring the petitioners to avail of the provision in R. 10-A of O. VII of that Code.

( 2 ) CANARA Bank Relief and Welfare Society, the first appellant in each of these appeals, was the first petitioner in each of the cases Misc. Case No. 1087/ 89 and Misc. Case No. 10078/89, on the file of the Court of City Civil Judge. K. S. Nair and Mrs. Sulekha Nair, the second and the third appellants in M. F. A. FR. No. 12573/ 89, were the second and the third petitioners in Misc. Case No. 10087/ 89, on the file of the Court of City Civil Judge. T. L. Narayana Rao and Smt. Meenakshi Narayana Rao, the second and the third appellants in M. F. A. FR. No. 12575/89 were the second and the third petitioners in Misc. Case No. 100









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top