SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 271

M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO, M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
VIRUPAXI – Appellant
Versus
SAROJINI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.VISHVESHVARA, K.S.Savanur

( 1 ) THIS is the husband's appeal on his failure to get a decree of annulment of the marriage with respondent 1 (his wife) inter alia on the ground that she committed adultery which was witnessed by the husband himself on 6-9-1972 and on the ground that the first respondent, his wife, had deserted him for over a period of seven years.

( 2 ) IN Miscellaneous Case No. 3 of 1980 in the Court of the Civil Judge at Athani, the petitioner pleaded that on his return from his shop to his house at a time he found respondents cohabiting sexually and seeing him they got up; he rebuked them. He rebuked and told her not to continue her adulterous life in furture. Thereafter the petitioner was shocked and he took meticulous care to refrain from having sexual intercourse with his wife. He further alleged that even thereafter the first respondent had her menstrual periods regularly up to 11-3-1973. However she gave birth to a male child on 18-12-1973. He therefore pleaded that the child born in December 1973 was not fathered by him. It was claimed by him that the said child was the progeny of the first respondent by her illicit relationship with the second respondent. On 7-4-1973, he alleged that


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top