SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 256

K.A.SWAMI, N.D.V.BHATT
ZAHIRA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
N. K. VISHALAKSHI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.VISHVESHVARA, S.SHAKAR SETTY

SWAMI, J.

( 1 ) LEARNED vii additional small causes judge, Bangalore city in h. r. c. No. 1679/1987 on i. A. No. I filed by the landlord respondent under Section 29 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (for short the'act')-

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the tenant of the ground floor of the premises No. 21/1 situated at 16th cross, I main road, sampangiramanagar, Bangalore. The respondent is the landlady of the premises. She has filed an application for eviction under Section 21 (l) (b), (c), (d), (f) and (h) of the act.

( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the aforesaid h. r. c. petition,she has filed an application i. A. No. I under Section 29 of the act for stopping further proceedings as the petitioner tenant has not paid the rents upto date.

( 4 ) HAVING regard to the pleas raised by the parties, the learned vii additional small causes judge, raised the following points for determination: 1) (a) does the petitioner prove that the agreed rent for the suit premises is Rs. 2300/- per month; or (b) does respondent prove that the agreed rent is Rs. 1800/- per mouth. 2) (a) does petitioner prove that the respondent is in arrears of the rent from 1-5-1987 at the rate of Rs. 2300/- per month; or

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top