S.MOHAN, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER – Appellant
Versus
B. HUKMINI K. SHETTY – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts leading to the Writ Appeal are shortly as follows ; premises known as 'hotel Shivaprasad', situated at Kundapur Town, belongs to a partnership firm consisting of the following partners : (1) V. K. Shetty; (2) B. Arunkumar Shetty ; (3) Arithkala S. Shetty ; (4) Vasanthamala R. Shetty ; and (5) Amrithkala S. Shetty. One P. M. Krishna Murthy Bhat was a lessee of this premises who was running a restaurant. O. S. No. 28/1978 was filed before the learned Civil Judge, Udipi, for his eviction. That ended in a decree in favour of the landlord. In execution of that decree in E. C. No. 14/1983 ultimately, possession was delivered to the landlord on 22-4-1983.
( 2 ) THEREAFTER the premises wasleased in favour of Smt. B. Rukmini K. Shetty (respondent herein) under lease deed dated 30-7-1983. She started a restaurant under the same name and style of Hotel Shivaprasad afresh. She obtained loan from the Bank for starting this restaurant with new furniture and utensils. She also obtained a fresh licence from the municipality which is required under the karnataka Municipalities Act for running restaurant. She recruited new employees. It may also 02 added that no one of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.