SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 393

B.J.HEGDE, D.P.HIREMATH
ZUBEDA KHATOON, BANGALORE CITY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LEGAL, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
M.V.DEVARAJ, V.MUKUND MENON

HIREMATH, J.

( 1 ) THE accused-appellant was committed to the City Sessions Court by the IV Metropolitan Magistrate of Bangalore city to face the trial for offences u/ss. 18 and 20 (b) (i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('the Act' for short hereafter ). The allegations against her were brief and simple. P. W. 1 the Superintendent of the Customs Intelligence, Headquarters Bangalore received an information on 22-7-1986 that Narcotic Drugs were concealed in the house of the appellant in her residence at No. 12. Devanahalli Subbanna Galli, Sadara Patrappa Road, Bangalore and he obtained authorization for searching the aforesaid premises from his superior officer viz. , the Assistant Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Bangalore u/s. 41 (i) of the Act and taking two panchas carried on search in that house at about 8-30 a. m. in the morning. In one of the rooms they found two bags containing 2. 5 kgs. and 5 kg. Ganja and also 30 grams opium all valued at Rs. 700/ -. They were seized under a panchanama at the spot and thereafter the accused-appellant was taken to the office and questioned there. She made a statement admitting possession of the same which came


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top