SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 409

B.P.SINGH
SESHUMULL M. SHAH – Appellant
Versus
SAYED ABDUL RASHID – Respondent


Advocates:
M.S.GOPALKRISHNA, S.K.Joshi, SHANTA W.JOSHI

( 1 ) THIS second appeal has been preferred by defendant No. 1 arising out of the suit filed by respondent-plaintiff for declaration of title and possession in respect of suit lands as also damages for the cutting of the Tamarind tree by defendant No. 1. The trial Court as well as the appellate Court have concurrently found in favour of the plaintiff and decreed the suit. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the appellate Court, namely, the Court of Principal Civil Judge, Kolar, dated 7-1-1980 in Regular Appeal No. 23/ 1978, this appeal has been preferred.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case may be briefly noticed : the plaintiff was admittedly the mother-in-law of defendant No. 2. Defendant No. 1 is a purchaser from defendant No. 2 of the suit lands. The case of the plaintiff is that her husband was an Engine Driver and she used to reside with him. By a registered sale deed, dated 29/03/1936, the plaintiff acquired title to the suit lands in consideration of her mehr dues. She was in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. Her son was also employed, and therefore for the management of the said property, she entrusted the same to defendant No. 2, who was the husband of her











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top