SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 449

B.P.SINGH
BYYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
RAMDEV – Respondent


Advocates:
M.R.RAGHUNATHACHAR, P.SUBBA RAO, T.RADHA KRISHNA

SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs second appeal. One Chowdappa had a son, by name Chikka ramaiah. Chikka Ramaiah was married to the plaintiff Byyamma. Chowdappa's daughter by name Chickkavcnkatamma had a son Ramdev who is the 2nd defendant. the first defendant, smt. Akkayyamma is the widow of Chowdappa.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff claimed partition of hershare in the joint family properties described in the Schedule claiming that she had l/3rd share, being the widow of a prc-deccascd son. the defendants denied her claim and asserted that she had only a right to be maintained by 2nd defendant in view of the Will executed by latc chowdappa on 12-12-1949 bequeathing his interest in favour of 2nd defendant while casting an obligation upon him to maintain the plaintiff and the 1st defendant.

( 3 ) A few facts that arc not in dispute may be noticed. Chowdappa and Muniyappa were brothers and they constituted a Joint Hindu family. the husband of the plaintiff, Chickka ramaiah son of Chowdappa died in the year 1940. By two release deeds dated 6-8-1943 and 14-3-1946 there was a partition between chowdappa and his brother. It is not disputed before me that the partition was effected through these




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top