SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 397

K.RAMACHANDRIAH
I. I. M. EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT – Respondent


Advocates:
N.KUMAR, S.G.SUNDARA SWAMY

RAMACHANDRAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed under order 43 rule-1 (r) C. P. C. by the plaintiff in o. s. No. 2544/89 on the file of the x additional city civil judge, Bangalore city (for short 'the trial judge') against the order dated 15-9-89 passed on i. as. Ii and iii by the learned trial judge dismissing i a. ii filed by the plaintiff under order 39 rules 1 and 2 C. P. C. for an order of temporary injunction restraining the respondent- defendant, their men etc. , from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of their office room described in the plaint schedule pending disposal of the suit filed by them for perpetual injunction and allowing i. a. ill filed by the respondent-defendant under order 39 rules 1 and 2 C. P. C. read with Section 151 C. P. C. for an order of temporary injunction against the plaintiff in respect of the same room restraining them, their office-bearers, members, agents etc. , from functioning and ceasing to occupy the said room either in groups or in single pending disposal of the suit.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience,reference will hereinafter be made to the parties to this appeal with reference to the positions they occupy in the suit

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top