Karnataka High Court
K.P.Acharya - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Decided On : 09-17-90
W.P. : 15999 of 1990
Circular - Interpretation of Sections 69 and 71 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Rule 97 (4) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1965 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Sections 69 and 71 of the Act, Rule 97 of the Rules - The court discussed the powers of the Deputy Commissioner, the nature of free pasturage, and the issuance of circulars by the Government. Key legal provisions were Sections 69 and 71 of the Act, Rule 97 (4) of the Rules, and the court's interpretation of the government's authority to issue circulars.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought relief against a circular that allegedly deprived villagers of grazing rights on public property. The petitioner argued that the circular contravened Sections 69 and 71 of the Act and Rule 97 of the Rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the circular did not interfere with the powers of the Deputy Commissioner and was within the competency of the Government. The court dismissed the writ petition.
Issues: Interpretation of Sections 69 and 71 of the Act, validity of the circular, powers of the Deputy Commissioner, and rights of villagers to graze cattle on public land.
Ratio Decidendi: The circular did not interfere with the powers of the Deputy Commissioner as it only laid down guidelines. The court also discussed previous decisions and their applicability to the case.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.
( 1 ) IN this petition the point to be considered is the interpretation of Sections 69 and 71 of the karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, read with rule 97 (4) of the Karnataka Land Revenue rules, 1965, coupled with the Circular issued by the Government in No. RD. 76 LGP 88 dated 14-10-1988 at Anncxurc-A and the subsequent modified circular dated 27-12-1989.
( 2 ) THE petitioner who is the resident of Kaup village of Dakshina Kannada District has filed this petition for and on behalf of himself and other villagers seeking for the following reliefs: (a) declare the Circular dated 27-12-1989 in No. RD 76. LGP. 88 issued by the respondent under Annexureb as ultra vires the provisions of the constitution of India and provisions of the land Revenue Act of 1964 and the rules framed thereunder; (b) to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent not to give effect to the circular under Annexure-B; (c) to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent to direct all its subordinate officers not to act upon circular 'b', and; (d) pass such other appropriate orders to meet the ends of justice. " the petitioner contended that by Circular at annexure-B, the Government intended to take away the powers conferred on the Deputy Commissioner of the district in respect of Gomal lands which are admittedly the properties of the mandal Panchayat. By such circular the right of all the villagers to graze their cattle in the said gomal land will be deprived of. Thus, indirectly it, affecting the rights of the villagers which they are using the public property.
( 3 ) IT is the case of the petitioner that the circular at Annexure-B is in direct contravention of Sections 69 and 71 of the Act. Section 69 of the Act reads as follows: "section 69-Disposal of lands or other property belonging to State Government under Section 67. Subject to such rules as may be made in this behalf, the State Government, the divisional Commissioner, the Deputy commissioner, the Assistant Commissioner incharge of a Taluk or Taluks and the tahsildar, may dispose of land or other property belonging to the State Government under Section 67 or otherwise, for purposes of agriculture, industry or any public utility and subject to the provisions of chapter XII for the construction of buildings. " section 71 of the Act reads as follows: "section 71. Lands may be assigned for special purposes and when assigned, shall not be otherwise used without sanction of the Deputy Commissioner. Subject to the general orders of the State Government, survey Officers, whilst survey operations are proceedings under this Act, and at any other time, the Deputy Commissioner, may set apart lands, which are the property of the State Government and not in the lawful occupation of any person or aggregate of persons in any village OF portions of a village, for forest reserves or for any other public purpose; and lands assigned specially for any such purpose shall not be otherwise used without the sanction of the Deputy commissioner, and in the disposal of lands under Section 69 due regard shall be had to all such special assignments. " rule 97 of the Rules reads as follows: "rule 97. Providing free pasturage. (1) Government land shall be set apart for free pasturage for the cattle of each village at the rate of twelve hectares for every hundred heads of cattle. Explanation:in calculation the heads of cattle for goats, sheep or calves or cow or buffalo shall be taken as equivalent to one head of cattle. (2) If there is sufficient various area in the village concerned or in the adjoining village to enable the village cattle to graze, the area to be set apart as free pasturage may be reduced correspondingly. (3) If there is any grazing land available in a village, or the land available falls short of the extent prescribed under sub-rule (1) the defi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.