SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 455

B.N.KRISHNAN, S.A.HAKEEM
Y. R. SHANBHAG – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMED CAUSE – Respondent


Advocates:
M.SOWRI RAJU

KRISHNAN, J,, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant was first respondent in m. V. C. No. 30 of 1976 before the Motor accidents Claims Tribunal, Uttar Kannada, karwar and being aggrieved by the award passed in the said case to pay compensation of Rs. 21,552/- to the claimant therein, has filed this appeal.

( 2 ) THE claim petition itself has beenpresented in somewhat unusual circumstances. The very case put forward by the claimant is that he was driving the vehicle bearing registration No. MEW 5144 belonging to the appellant herein on 10-1-1976 (incorrectly mentioned in the course of the petition and judgment as 11-1-1976} and that it met with an accident in between milestone No. 36/3, 36/4 and 36/5 at Subguli and Sunkasal, Ankola taluk and that the petitioner-claimant was driving the truck at that time in the employment of the owner. Nowhere in the course of the petition, claimant has stated that the vehicle was being driven by anyona else and muchless that it was being driven rashly or negligently. Even in the course of his examination before the Tribunal he has put forward the case that he was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident. After the parties went to trial, the Tribunal has reco









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top