SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 564

K.J.SHETTY
HANAMAPPA CHETRAPPA KOPPAL – Appellant
Versus
NIL – Respondent


Advocates:
F.S.DABALI

JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners against the order passed in M. C. No. 23 of 1989, dated 18-6-1990 by the Civil Judge, gadag, praying therein to set aside the impugned order and to grant a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved under sub-section (2) of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ('act' for short ).

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated facts are that the petitioners were married according to Hindu rites on 18-12-1988 at Hole Alur in Ron taluk. After the marriage, they lived together for a period of one week in the first petitioners house. But the second petitioner did not allow the 1st petitioner her husband to have any matrimonial connection with her. They started living separately from each other after about three weeks of their marriage. They have not been able to live together and the marriage between them was completely broken and there was no possibility of reconciliation and, therefore, they filed a petition under section 13 (B) (1) of the Act, for a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 25-10-1989.

( 3 ) IN the petition it is stated that after the marriage the petitioners lived together hardly for one w























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top