SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Kar) 8

K.B.NAVADGI, K.S.BHATT
AKASH FILMS – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
G.CHANDRAKUMAR, K.R.Prasad, S.R.Shivaprakash

SHIVASHANKAR BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THE following question of law is referred for our answer at the instance of the assessee under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the act' for short):-"on the facts and in the circumstances of the assessee's case, whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the expenditure incurred by the assessee was hit by Section 40-A (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"

( 2 ) IN the course of the assessment proceedings for the year 1976-77, a sum of Rs. 50,000/-was found to have been debited in the profit and loss account. This represented the loss sustained by the assessee on a picture called 'nirman'. The assessee is a distributor of films and sought sole distributorship of the film 'nirman' for Andhra pradesh for a consideration of Rs. 95,000/ -. The agreement was dated 6-12-1974. The assessee paid a sum of Rs. 5,000/- on one date in cash and further sum of Rs. 45,000/- subsequently. Since the picture was a failure, the assessee did not release the film and wrote off this sum of rs. 50,000/ -. The claim of the assessee for excluding this sum was rejected by the Income-tax officer on two grounds: i) the payment was made by cash in contravention









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top