SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Kar) 223

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
SHIVANANJAPPA – Appellant
Versus
BASAVARAJU – Respondent


Advocates:
M.B.NARGUND

M. P. CHANDRAKANTARAJ, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendant's second appeal having suffered adverse Judgments and decrees by the trial Court as well as the lower appellate Court. The brief facts leading to this appeal may be stated and they are as follows: plaintiffs Basavaraju, Gancshappa and parvathi filed Original Suit No. 173 of 1981 in the court of the Principal Munsiff at Arasikere pleading that defendant Shivananjappa was none other than the brother of the father of plaintiffs 1 and 2 and husband of plaintiff No. 3 Byregowda. Defendant had dispossessed them from the suit schedule properties after Byregowda had left arasikere without being traced some two years earlier. It was their case that the defendant (appellant in this Court) had been enjoying suit property for 7 to 8 years prior to the filing of the suit denying them the fruits though there was a partition between Byregowda and the defendant shivananjappa. The fact that Byregowda had not been traced for more than nine years, lead to the presumption that he was dead and therefore, plaintiffs 1 to 3 had acquired, right, title and interest in the properties of Byregowda and therefore, they were entitled to the declaration of title







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top