CHANDRAKANTARAJ, J.

( 1 ) THE Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation who was the first respondent in E. S. I. Application No. 30 of 1986 being aggrieved by the order dated 4th of February, 1991, passed by the Employees State Insurance court at Bangalore in E. S. I. Application No. 30/1986 holding that the applicant before it was not required to be covered by the Employees state Insurance Corporation as the applicant had less than ten persons in his establishment, has questioned the legality and correctness of the said order inter alia on the ground that the finding recorded by the E. S. I. Court is not correct and in accordance with law. The respondent-Karnataka Asbestos Cement Products filed an application under Section 75 of the Act challenging the order and consequent demands passed under Section 45-A demanding a sum of Rs. 24,364/- for the period between January 1980 to December 1985 and contribution of Rs. 3,509/- for the period from 1- 1-1986 to 31-5-1986 towards the wages paid to the employees. The respondent contended that he has not employed more than six persons and he was also not served with the copy of the report of the Inspector R. W, 1, which report

Click Here to Read the rest of this document