K.J.SHETTY, M.RAMA JOIS
MUNIVENKATAPPA – Appellant
Versus
CHIKKAPAPANMIA – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this second appeal presented under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code referred to division bench under Section 9 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, the following question of law arises for consideration:whether in a second appeal presented before this court under Section 100 of the C. P. C. this court has no power to allow a party to produce additional evidence even if the conditions specified in clause (aa) of order 41, Rule 27 are satisfied?
( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are these: according to the appellant munivenkatappa, he purchased 2 acres of land in sy. No. 45/5 of kooteri village, kasaba hobli, kolar taluk, by registered sale deed dated 18-1-1951 (marked as ex. D-4 in the suit) and that he purchased another 32 guntas of land in the same survey number under a registered sale deed dated 5-3-1953 (marked as ex. D-5 in the suit) from one hanumanthappa, the father of the respondent. O. s. No. 41 of 1974 was filed by respondent-chikkapapamma praying for declaration and possession of the very property purchased by the appellant under the two registered sale deeds from hanumanthappa. The case of the respondent-plaintiff was that on the date on whi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.