SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Kar) 329

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, S.MOHAN
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER – Appellant
Versus
HARIHAR POLYFIBRES – Respondent


Advocates:
R.GURURAJAN, SHYLENDRA KUMAR

MOHAN, J.

( 1 ) THE short facts are as follows: - 33 employees' working in M/s. Harihar polylibres, kumarapatnam were contributing to birla brothers provident fund. This contribution was prior to 1-1-1975. It was at that period the unit came under the Provisions of the employees' provident funds miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' ). The schemes framed earlier required contribution at the rate of 10%. After the establishment was notified under the act by order dated 1-1-1975, all the employees who were earlier contributing to birla brothers provident fund were taken to the statutory provident fund. Accordingly their contributions which were required at the rale of 10% to birla brothers provident fund came to be reduced to the statutory minimum of 8% from 1-1-1975 unilaterally. Therefore the question arose whether the employers vi/. . M/s. Harihar polyfibres were within the powers to reduce the existing higher rate of contribution applicable to the statutory minimum of 8% unilaterally? If that is so, whether such a deduction in the existing benefits in the nature of higher rate of contribution would not offend Section 12 of the act. This matter c




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top