D.R.VITHAL RAO, K.A.SWAMI
M. B. RUMACHUNDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 2 ) IN all these petitions, the petitioners have sought for a declaration that the scheme 'mini forest' to the east of jayamahal extension, Bangalore notified as per notification No. Alao/la/l/pr/1977-78, dated 5-4-1977 (Annexure-A) and the notification No. Hud 72 mnj 77, dated 7-2-1978 issued under sections 17 (1) and 17 (3) and Section 19 respectively of the Bangalore development authority Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') has lapsed by operation of law and to quash the aforesaid notifications. They have also sought for a further direction restraining the respondents from taking any steps against the petitioners for taking possession of the lands notified under the aforesaid notifications. The petitioners have also further prayed for a declaration that the scheme had lapsed and as such the aforesaid notifications are liable to be quashed, therefore, to quash the impugned notifications.
( 3 ) UNDER the notification dated 5-4-1977 published in the Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.