SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Kar) 415

RAJENDRA BABU
INDIAN ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
H.B.DATAR, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, K.R.D.KARANTH

RAJENDRA BABU, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER No. 1 is a company engaged in the manufacture of aluminium metal and has a smeltor complex at Belgaum. It is alleged that in response to "an I nvitation to Investors in Industry" published by the Government of Karnataka in 1966, the petitioners set up a smeltor complex and an aluminium plant at Belgaum on the basis of the assurances given by the State Government in the said brochure. An agreement was entered into between the 1st petitioner, the State government and the State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on 26-3-1966 for supply of electric power at a fixed rate for the duration of the agreement. In the said agreement provision was made for supply of power at a fixed rate with electricity tax at stipulated rate for a period of 25 years with an option for renewal for a further period of 25 years. On the basis of the terms and conditions of the aforesaid agreement, it is claimed by the 1 st petitioner, that it set up the complex making investment of several crores of Rupees. . After the announcement of Aluminium Policy by the Government of India on 15-7-1975 a new agreement was entered into between the State, the board and


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top