SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Kar) 450

M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO
RAMAMMA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.GANGADHARAPPA, M.KUMAR SINGH, M.SIDDA GANGAIAH

M. RAMAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the order made by the assistant commissioner at Annexure 'a' and also another order made earlier at Annexure 'b' and he has sought for quashing the same. Indeed, the petitioner has also sought for quashing the order of the deputy commissioner in the appeal at Annexure 'c for the reasons set out in the writ petition.

( 2 ) A few facts that are necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are asfollows: small piece of land measuring 2 acres 12 guntas in sy. No. 89/10 of belagumba village, kasaba hobli, arsikere taluk, hassan district, came to be granted in favour of marigaiah, husband of the petitioner by the competent authority under the Mysore land grant rules by an order made on 17-11-1947, subject to certain conditions. One such condition was that the grantee shall not alienate the granted land to any person at any time. The fact remains that out of granted land, 1 acre came to be sold in favour of late T. S. lingappa, 3rd respondent herein by a registered sale deed dated 8-10-1970, and the remaining granted land came to be sold in favour of t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top