SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 83

NANJUADASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S.SUBBA RAO, N.K.Gupta, S.A.NAZIR, V.TARKARAM

S. P. BHARUCHA, C. J.

( 1 ) THE Writ Petition itself is referred to the full bench for hearing and final disposal.

( 2 ) THE Writ petitioner is a member of the third respondent, which is a co-operative Bank, registered under the Karnataka Co-operaive Socities act, 1959. ' The Writ petitioner had filed a nomination paper for being elc6e4 upon the Committee of Management of the third respondent. At the time of scrutiny of the nomination papers an objection was raised, that the Writ petitioner was a partner of a partnership firm called Lakshmi Financers and that, therefore, his nomination ought to be rejected. The petitioner brought various documents to the knowledge of the Returning Officer to rebut the objection. However, the objection was upheld. The Writ Petition was filed to quash the order of the Returning Officer on the ground that he had erred in considering the documents produced by the Writ petitioner.

( 3 ) THE learned single Judge, when the Writ Petition came up before him for Preliminary Hearing, referred it to a Division Bench in view of the conflicting Decisions of two Division Benches of this Court. When the matter came up before the Division Bench, the Division Bench












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top