NANJUADASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Writ Petition itself is referred to the full bench for hearing and final disposal.
( 2 ) THE Writ petitioner is a member of the third respondent, which is a co-operative Bank, registered under the Karnataka Co-operaive Socities act, 1959. ' The Writ petitioner had filed a nomination paper for being elc6e4 upon the Committee of Management of the third respondent. At the time of scrutiny of the nomination papers an objection was raised, that the Writ petitioner was a partner of a partnership firm called Lakshmi Financers and that, therefore, his nomination ought to be rejected. The petitioner brought various documents to the knowledge of the Returning Officer to rebut the objection. However, the objection was upheld. The Writ Petition was filed to quash the order of the Returning Officer on the ground that he had erred in considering the documents produced by the Writ petitioner.
( 3 ) THE learned single Judge, when the Writ Petition came up before him for Preliminary Hearing, referred it to a Division Bench in view of the conflicting Decisions of two Division Benches of this Court. When the matter came up before the Division Bench, the Division Bench
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.