SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 61

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
HANUMANTHAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
H.Kantharaj, S.F.SHANKAR, S.R.Shivaprakash

M. RAMAJOIS, J.

( 1 ) IN these three appeals presented under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the following two questions of law arises for consideration: (1) Whether the Insurance Company with which a Tractor and a Trailer propelled by the tractor are insured, is liable to pay compensation in respect of death or bodily injury to persons travelling in the trailer? and (2) If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, what is the extent of liability of the Insurance Company?

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case are these: On 5-3-1985 the Tractor-Trailer bearing Registration Nos. MEU 9801 and 9802 respectively were being used for the purpose of transporting Country manure from Hottiganahally village to the land of respondent-1. After unloading the manure, when the tractor was on its way back to Hittiganahally there was an accident. As a result, three employees, who were engaged as labourers for loading and unloading manure, and who were travelling in the trailer sustained severe injuries and died as a result of the injuries so sustained. Three claim petitions were presented. They are: (I) M. V. C. No. 469/1985, in which the petitioner-claimant claimed










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top