SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 146

P. MADHAVAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
K. RAVINDRAN UNNI – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.MONNAPPA, NALINI CHIDAMBARAM, S.SHEKHAR SHETTY

KRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are directed against the common Judgement passed by the Family Court, in two proceedings initiated before it under the provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, in respect of the custody of one Varun, a minor child. G. and W. C. No. 73/87 was filed by the grandparents of the said Varun to appoint them as guardians of their grand-child and G and W. C. No. 75/87 was filed by the father of the said Varun to get custody of his son. The first petition came to be dismissed and the second petition came to be allowed and therefore, the grand-parents who happen to be the petitioners in the first petition and respondents in the second petition have preferred these appeals.

( 2 ) THE evidence has been recorded in the first petition G and W. C. No. 73/87 and in the lower Court the parties have been REFERRED TO by virtue of the ranks they had occupied in the 1st petition. For the sake of convenience we will also adopt the same course of reference to the parties, by virtue of their ranks occupied in G and W. C. No. 73/87 or by virtue of their relationship as occasion may demand.

( 3 ) CERTAIN factual events leading up to the filing of the petitions are pract













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top