S. R. NARAYANA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) AT the stage of admission, records are received. The respondent has been notified and it has put in appearance through a counsel.
( 2 ) AS the appeal can be disposed of on a short point, it is admitted and heard for final disposal.
( 3 ) DURING the course of bearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-b. d. a. has produced two gazette notifications dated 20-5-1984 published in the official gazette, dated 28-6-1984 and 23-11-1988 published in the official gazette, dated 23-2-1989 issued under sections 17 (1) and 19 (1) respectively of the Bangalore development authority Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') acquiring the suit lands along with several other lands for the formation of shinivagalu tank bed (breached) and surrounding area layout. Sri U. L. Narayana rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he has no objection for permitting the b. d. a. to produce the aforesaid two notifications as additional evidence. In addition to this, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant, that one of ihe lands viz. , s. No. 21/3 was withdrawn from acquisition and in support of this, he has produced a gazette
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.