SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 167

K. MUNDAS LAXMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
D.BHUPATHY, K.RAGHAVENDRA RAO, M.Raghavendra Achar, P.VISHWANATH SHETTY

N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) SRI m. Raghavendra achar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P. Vishwanath shetty, leamed counsel for respondent-3, Sri K. Raghavendra rao, learned counsel for respondent-4 and Smt. D. Bhoopathy, learned hcgp for respondents-1 and 2 took notices on my direction.

( 2 ) HEARD on merits as requested by all the advocates though it is listed in theorders list.

( 3 ) THE relief sought in this writ petition is to quash Annexure-E which is an order passed by the government of Karnataka on 2-4-1992 approving the appointment of 4th respondentas principal of a college known as gowtham pre-university college, sakalespur, hassan district. According to the petitioners, the full facts which are relevant to decide the correctness or otherwise of Annexure-A are as follows: third respondent is a private educational institution. It is admitted to grant-in-aid code and is running a pre-university college. As per annexure-a, on 3-12-1986 these two petitioners and three other persons were appointed as lecturers to teach in different faculties. The date of appointment of the first petitioner was 24-9-1985 and the date of appointment of the second petitioner was 5-8-1985.



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top