SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 271

Karnataka High Court
Siddalingappa - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Decided On : 09-08-92
C.A. : 136 of 1992

Advocates:
MAHABALESHWAR GOUD, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, S.R.BANNUNNATH

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code 1973 - Section 374(2) - Appeal - Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 302 r/w. Sections 353, 506, 34 - Murder - Appellants caused the death of the deceased who was being tried for the murder of their father - Session Court found the accused guilty - Whether any ground for interference? (No)

       Held, that applying that well established principle of appreciation of evidence and even exercising the caution that is required of us we do find that the two witnesses P.W. 8 and P.W. 9 are very natural witnesses whose evidence has not been shown to be shaky by any standard but on the other hand their efforts must be commended for having immediately over-powered the 4 assailants who were armed with weapons like jambias and for having taken them to the police station without any loss of time. In our view therefore the Sessions Court was right in believing the evidence of these witnesses and we do not find any infirmity in their evidence. (Para 15)

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

       

HIREMATH, J.

( 1 ) THE present appellants and another Basalingappa s/o Basappa were tried before the Sessions Court at Raichur for offences under Sections 302, 353 and 506 r/w S. 34, IPC and 109 r/w S. 302, IPC. The substantive charge of these offences was against A. 1 to A. 4, the present appellants. The 5th accused was charged only under Section 109 r/w Section 302, I. P. C. for having abetted the commission of the murder of deceased Rangappa by A. 1 to A. 4. While A. 5 was acquitted, the present appellants were convicted under Sections 302, 324 and 353 r/w S. 34, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life, simple imprisonment for one month and simple imprisonment for 6 months respectively each for the aforesaid offences.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case is brief and simple. A. 1 to A. 2 that is appellants 1 and 2 herein are the sons of one Sangyarangayya of the same village Honnakatamalli in Deodurg Taluk of Raichur District. This Sangya Rangayya was murdered some time prior to this incident that occurred on 15-4-1990. Deceased Rangappa was suspected to have committed his murder and he was also arrested and detained in the sub jail at Deodurg pending investigation. There is a Magistrate's Court at Deodurg. He and other two prisoners were due to be produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate's Court at Deodurg on 21-5-1990. As the local Magistrate was on leave, deceased Rangappa and 2 other prisoners that is PW 10 Babu and PW 15 Chandrappa were required to be taken to Raichur for being produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. For that purpose the police escort was arranged by PW 31 the Head Constable of Deodurg Police Station. He deputed PWs 8 and 9, the police constables and H. C. Ramalinappa, CW. 1 who died during the pendency of this case. Thus the escort party consisted of the H. C. and the two police constables. At 7. 10 a. m. he directed these police officials to go to sub jail, receive the 3 Under Trial Prisoners (U. T. P. for short) and then take them to Raichur and they were also directed to hand cuff them while being taken out of the jail. Accordingly, this escort party went to the sub jail and took to their custody 3 U. T. Ps. from the Head Warden PW. 3 Mallikarjuna of the sub jail to their custody. R. Rangappa the deceased U. T. P. No. 1000 was involved in the murder case of Sangya Rangayya whereas the other 2 U. T. Ps. were involved in some other cases which is not quite relevant for our purpose. Escort was arranged in fact at the request of this PW. 3 as it was his duty to produce these U. T. Ps. before the concerned Court. Relevant entries were made in the register maintained in the sub jail which they call "gate register" when the 3 U. T. Ps. were handed over to the custody of the 3 police officials. Necessary entry was also made in the Jail Court Register in this behalf. Thereafter this escort party hand cuffed deceased Rangappa and PW 10 with one hand cuff whereas a separate cuff was used for PW 15 Chandrappa. A leading chain attached to the handcuff of PW 10 was held by P. C. PW 5. Another hand cuff which was put to Chandrappa was held by PW 8. They left the sub jail premises at 7. 25 a. m. and went to the local bus-stand to catch a K. S. R. T. C. bus to go to Raichur. By about 8 a. m. or so the bus arrived at its stand and it was bound for Raichur from Tintini, it was MEF 8304. It was parked at platform No. 9 and all the passengers alighted from it and may be for refreshments. Even the driver and the conductor went to the bus stand hotel for tiffin. The bus was almost empty when this escort party and the 3 U. T. Ps. boarded it. They were made to sit on one of the seats in the middle meant to accommodate 3 passengers and the constables as well as the head constable occupied different seats in front and behind the seat on which the U. T. Ps. were seated. Perhaps all of them were waiting for the driver and conductor to return and then for the departure of the bus.

( 3 ) WITHIN a short while after they














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top