SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 312

K. N. SUBBA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
P.P.MUTHANNA, P.R.Ramesh

S. RAJENDRA BABU, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India to espouse a public cause. The petitioner is seeking for the following reliefs :i. For a direction to restrain respondent No. 1 from spending any amount towards the function slated for 17-10-1992 to mark the second anniversary of assumption of office of Chief Minister by respondent No. 2; and ii) For a direction to respondent No. 1 to take steps for recovery of whatever funds that has already been spent on the function slated for 17-10-1992 to mark the second anniversary of assumption of office of Chief Minister by respondent No. 2. And to grant certain interim reliefs.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner made submissions on five aspects, namely : (1) that the money is spent only to glorify the second respondent; (2) that the said expenditure is without the authority of law; (3) that it runs contrary to the austerity policy adopted by the Government as disclosed in the budgetary speech made by the second respondent; (4) that release of buses in the State will cause great public inconvenience; and (5) that the land where the convention is sought to be held itself is involved in liti






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top