( 1 ) THESE three criminal revision petitions are preferred by the appellant against a common order dated /-3-1992 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessions judge, Bangalore, in Criminal Appeal Nos. 81 of 1990, 5 of 1991 and 6 of 1991. The learned Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, dismissed Cr. A. No. 6 of 1991, whereas he allowed Cr. A. Nos. 81 of 1990 and 5 of 1991 is part. Since these three criminal revision petitions are filed by the same appellant against a common order passed by the learned Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Metropolitan area, Bangalore, I have heard them together and I am passing a common order in these three appeals.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent fully and perused the records of the case.

( 3 ) THE respondent filed complaint against the petitioner at C. C. No. 2744 of 1988 alleging that the petitioner has not filed his returns of ESI contribution in time. The respondent has also filed complaint against the petitioner at C. C. No. 1183 of 1988 alleging that the petitioner has committed the offence by not making payment of contribution towards ESI