SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 350

PARAGOUNDA – Appellant
Versus
BHIMAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
ANANT MANDGI, Ashok Kalyan Shetty, P.G.MAGOLI, S.K.V.Chalapathy, S.VIJAYASHANKAR

HAKEEM, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 7 of the Karnataka High Court Act, the following questions are referred for the opinion of the Full Bench :-" (1) Whether the Full Bench decision of this Court reported in ILR 1990 Kar 1 : (AIR 1990 Kar 116 (FB) applies to a case only where the transfer of ownership of a vehicle is entered in the Certificate of Registration as required under Section 31 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, and has no application where it is not so entered ? (2) If the answer to the above question is in the negative, whether the decision reported in 1990 (2) Kar LJ 281 is good law ?"

( 2 ) SINCE the reference has arisen in a review petition, the brief facts of the case leading to the reference are stated as under :- on 24-2-1987, the car bearing Registration No. MR- 5694 driven by respondent-5, while proceeding on Saundatti-Munawalli Road in Belgaum District, dashed against P. W. 1 Gujjawwa and Tulasawwa, causing injuries to the former and instant death of the latter person. The accident and the resultant death of Tulasawwa and injuries sustained by P. W. 1 are not disputed. It is also established that the accident was due to the negligence of the driver of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top