SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Kar) 329

PATEL ENTERPRISES, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
M. P. AHUJA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V.NAGARATHNA, BAPU HEDDURA SHETTY, H.R.VENKATASAMANIAH

K. SHIVASHANKAR BTIAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the third defendant against an order made in la. Iii in o. s. No. 10511 of 1992, on the file of the court of vi additional city civil judge at Bangalore. By that Order, the third defendant was restrained from receiving and defendants 1 and 2 were restrained from paying the amount involved, to the third defendant.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff, it obtained the rights in respect of a film called "haathi mera saathi" under an agreement dated 31-12-1986 from M/s. Vijayalaxmi movies at Madras, which had earlier acquired all the rights of distribution, exhibition, exploitation and negative rights including t. v. and video cassette rights in the said film. The film was produced earlier by M/s. Devar films. It seems that M/s. Vijayalaxmi movies leased the said rights to M/s. Manjusha films on 21-6-1976 and M/s. Manjusha films, in turn, conveyed these rights to the plaintiff under an agreement dated 31-12-1986. Thereafter, the plaintiff corresponded with the doordarshan for the telecasting of the film on the national net work. According to the plaintiff, at one stage, the plaintiff withdrew the offer made to the doordarshan, but thereafte

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top