( 1 ) THOUGH this appeal has come up for orders, having regard to the fact that it can be disposed of on a short point it is heard for final disposal,

( 2 ) THIS appeal is preferred against the order dated 24-2-1992 passed by thelearned single judge in writ petition no. 4654 of 1992.

( 3 ) THE learned single judge has rejected the writ petition. Hence, the petitioner inthe writ petition has come up in this appeal.

( 4 ) IN the writ petition, the petitioner sought for quashing the order dated 7-1-1992bearing no. P. d-a. 107/1990-91 passed by the assistant commissioner, shinroga sub-division, shimoga and the order dated 15-10-1990 bearing no. Nada. rr. tcr. 59:90-91 passed by the deputy tahsildar, nada kacheri, kallihal, bhadravathi taluk. The proceeding was initiated before the tahsildar, nada kacheri by the appellant/petitioner for mutating his name in respect of s. No. 82/2 on the death of his ancestor. That was objected to by the fourth respondent on the ground that an extent of 1 acre 30 guntas comprised in s. No. 82/2 was sold by the ancestor of the appellant under a registered sale deed dated 13th march, 1972. The tahsildar found that though the sale deed mentio