A.B.MURGOD
KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED, KODIALBAIL, MANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
A. B. DATAR – Respondent
( 1 ) MISCELLANEOUS first appeal 2385 of 1992 is filed by the first defendant under order 43, Rule 1 (r) of CPC against the order dated 1141-1992 passed in original suit No. 6835 of 1992 by the 15th additional city civil judge, Bangalore, allowing the prayer for temporary injunction in i. a. i under order 39, rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
( 2 ) MISCELLANEOUS first appeal 2386 of 1992 in filed by the first defendant under order 43, Rule l (r), CPC against the order dated 16414992 in original suit No. 6843 of 1992 on the file of the 15th additional city civil judge, Bangalore, partly allowing the prayer for temporary injunction in i. a. i under order 39, rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC.
( 3 ) SINCE the appeals involved common questions of facts and law, they aredisposed of by the following common judgment.
( 4 ) THE facts giving rise to these appeals are as under: the Karnataka bank limited is a well-known banking institution and it is registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The board of directors in its meeting on 16-94992 decided to hold the 68th annual general meeting of the Karnataka bank limited on 29th day of oc
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA V ESCORTS LTD. AND OTHERS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.