SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Kar) 126

S.VENKATARAMAN
LAXMI BAI – Appellant
Versus
KAMALAKSHA G. NAYAK – Respondent


Advocates:
C.S.DEVARAKANATH, K.SHIVAJI RAO, S.G.SUNDARA SWAMY

S. VENKATARAMAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed by defendants 1 to 4 in O. S. 201 of 1985, on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge, Mangalore against his order dated 24/09/1992, allowing I. A. No. VIII and permitting the plaintiff (1st respondent herein) to amend the plaint, as sought for by him.

( 2 ) RESPONDENTS 2 to 4 herein are defendants 5 to 7 in the lower Court. For the purpose of convenience the parties will be referred to by the rank they hold in the lower Court.

( 3 ) THE facts, giving raise to this petition, may briefly be stated as hereunder: the plaintiff filed a suit in O. S. 201/85, on the file of the Civil Judge, Mangalore, against the defendants, who are the wife and children of one late K. Rama Rao for a declaration that he is entitled to continue in possession of the suit property by virtue of part performance of an agreement to sell dated 5-5-1978 executed by Rama Rao and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession of the suit property. He alleged in the plaint that Rama Rao agreed to sell the suit property to him for Rs. 49,500/- and received a sum of Rs. 20,000/ - out of the consideration; that he was





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top