( 1 ) IN this writ petition a simple question seems to have been blown out of proportion, to be in proportion to the subject-matter of the sale deed. The petitioners seek to restrain the second respondent from proceeding with an appeal filed before him by the first respondent, apparently under Section 72 of the Registration Act, 1908 ('the act' for short ). The petitioners also seek the quashing of an order made by the second respondent on 25-5-1993 whereby the first respondent held that he had competence to entertain and consider the said appeal. Another order sought to be quashed is dated 22-/-1993 (annexure-ac), though the order of the said date states that the second respondent has reserved his orders on i. as. l, 2 and 3 filed before him to be pronounced on 28-/-93. The writ petition was presented on 26-/-93 and 28-/-93 after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the first respondent, Rule was issued and an interim order was made staying further proceedings before the second respondent. A direction was also issued to post the writ petition for disposal during the week commencing 30th august, 1993. The interim order states that the first respondent h