SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Kar) 212

K.S.BHATT
DADA AND COMPANY, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
PRADIP RAI, T.Basavaraju, U.L.NARAYAN RAO

K. S. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS are wholesale dealers holding licences under the Provisions of the Karnataka essential commodities licensing Order, 1986 (referred to as the 'licence order' ). They challenge clause 14 (l) (d) of the licensing order: clause 14 of the licensing order reads thus: "14. Power of entry, search and seizure, etc. (1) the licensing authority or any other officer of the department of food and civil supplies not below the rank of a food inspector authorised by the director of food and civil supplies or any police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector or any officer of revenue department not below the rank of revenue inspector within their jurisdiction may with such assistance, if any as he thinks fit and he has reason to believe that there is or has been contravention of the Provisions of the order or with a view to securing compliance with the order or to satisfy himself that there is or has been any contravention of the order (a) require the owner, occupier or any other person in-charge of any place, premises, vehicle or vessel in which he has reason to believe that any contravention of the Provisions of this order or of the conditions of the licence









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top