SHIVARAJ PATIL, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is filed under Section 50 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act against the order dated 27-9-1993, passed by the iii additional judge, court of small causes, Bangalore, in h. r. c. No. 10854 of 1989 on la. No. 8.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the tenant. The respondent is thelandlady. They will be referred to as such during the course of this order for convenience.

( 3 ) THE facts, briefly stated, are the following:the landlady filed petition seeking eviction of the tenant under Section 21 (1) (h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (for short 'the act' ). When the tenant remained absent, the trial court passed the ex parte order on 22-1-1990 granting two months' time to him to vacate the schedule premises. Later, the tenant filed a civil revision petition as well as miscellaneous petition for setting aside the ex parte order. The ex parte order was set aside and the h. r. c. petition was restored. Thereafter the landlady filed la. No. Ii under Section 29 (1) and (4) of the Act, which was allowed on 28-6-1991 directing the tenant to pay the arrears of rent within one month from that date. On his failure to pay the arrears of rent, on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document