SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Kar) 251

K.S.BHATT
RAMA RECREATION ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
Satish Doddamani, Vishnu D.Bhat

K. S. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THE question is whether the activities of a club or the activities of an association popularly referred as a club require licensing under the provisions of the Karnataka Police Act. the petitioner which is a registered society is formed by its members for playing games of recreation like carrom, chess, rummy, etc. The members of the public are not allowed as a matter of right or on payment to participate in the games. The recreational activities referred above are confined to the members of the club. The petitioner asserts that the respondents have been interfering with their activities frequently and have been insisting that a licence is necessary under the relevant Licensing order issued under the Karnataka Police Act. The respondents rely on the provisions of the Karnataka Public Amusement licensing Order issued under the provisions of the aforesaid Act.

( 2 ) THE licensing of any place under the said Order is requiredonly when it is a place of public amusement or it is a place of public entertainment. These are defined under Section 2 (14) and 2 ( 15) of the Act. They read as follows:"2 (14): 'place of public amusement' means any place where music, singing,




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top