SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Kar) 59

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, S.B.MAJMUDAR
RAFIA SHAHEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
A.M.Farooq, H.B.Narayan, MOHAMMED FARUQ

RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) THE common question that arises in these two appeals is whether a student claiming to belong to the Group of 'darvesu' among Muslims, will be entitled to the benefit of reservation under Article 15 (4) of the Constitution provided under Group A of the Government Order No. SWL 66 BCA 86 dated 13-10-1986, only if his parents carry on the occupation denoted by the name 'darvesu'.

( 2 ) ADMISSIONS to Medical, Engineering and certain other professional courses are regulated by the Karnataka Selection of candidates for admission to Engineering, Medical, Dental, Pharmacy and Nursing Courses Rules, 1993 ('rules' for short ). Rule 12 (4) of the said Rules provides that reservations shall be made for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Groups A, B, C, D and E in accordance with the order issued in G. O. No. SWL. 66 BCA 86 dated 13-10-1986 and other related orders issued from time to time. Rule 10 (3) of the said Rules provides that no candidate seeking reservation for admission under Rule 12 (4) shall be admitted to any institution unless he produces a validity certificate obtained under Rule 7 of Karnataka Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes and

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top