SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Kar) 72

R.V.RAVEENDRAN
B. M. SATISH – Appellant
Versus
BANGALORE UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Advocates:
M.N.SHESHADRI, N.K.PATIL, S.R.Shivaprakash, Vagdevi Associates

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) IN all these petitions, the petitioners are students of National College, Jayanagar, Bangalore (Second Respondent), who have not been permitted to take the examinations for want of required attendance. They seek a direction to respondents to permit them to take their annual examination to be held in April/may, 1994.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS contend that the college notified a list of about 230 students of B. Sc. , B. A. and B. Com. courses, who were not eligible to take the annual examination to be held in April-May, 1994, for w want of minimum attendance; that thereafter the Attendance Committee constituted by the College considered the cases of such students and excused the shortage in attendance of about 180 students and that only about 50 students including the petitioners were still found to be ineligible for want of attendance. The grievance of the petitioners is that while in the case of several students, similarly placed, shortage in attendance was excused, it was not done so in their cases. The petitioners do not say that they have the required attendance as per the regulations and that the college has committed some mistake in calculating the attendance













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top