SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Kar) 87

R.V.VASANTHA KUMAR
SHA JETMAL – Appellant
Versus
GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAYS – Respondent


Advocates:
C.R.V.SWAMY RAO, G.J.Nagaraja Rao, N.S.Srinivasan, R.G.SURESH, SANJAY GOWDA

R. V. VASANTHA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in R. A. No. 6/90 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Shimoga. The first appellate Court while dismissing the appeal confirmed the decree passed by the Court of Civil Judge, in O. S. No. 13/83 wherein the plaintiff's suit was dismissed. A few facts briefly stated are thus:

( 2 ) THE plaintiff field a suit for recovery of Rs. 92,282-20 being the value of the consignment despatched. Since the same was not delivered at the intended destination the plaintiff caused a notice through his Advocate dated 22-6-1982 addressed to the General Manager, Southern Railways, Madras, The Chief Commercial Superintendent, Southern Railways, Madras and the Chief Commercial Superintendent, Jodhpur. It is also an admitted fact that the notice which was got issued by the plaintiff through his Advocate was not signed either by the party or by the Advocate. The plaintiff has got the copy of the notice marked as Ex. P-12, whereas the defendants have got the copy of Ex. P. 12 (another copy of the notice) marked as Ex. D-2.

( 3 ) FROM a perusal of Ex. P. 12 and Ex. D. 2 it could be stated that the contents






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top