SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Kar) 106

A.B.MURGOD
K. M. MUNIREDDY – Appellant
Versus
B. K. LAKSHMAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
C.R.V.SWAMY RAO, S.G.SUNDARA SWAMY, S.NANJUNADASWAMY

MURGOD, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS 1 and 2 in Original Suit No. 582 of 1982 are the appellants in this appeal, plaintiff in O. S. No,582 of 1982 is respondent no 1. Defendants 3 to 6 and 7 to 9 are respondents 2 to 8. Parties in this Appeal are referred to by their ranks in the trial Court.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF - B. K. Lakshmaiah filed a Suit for declaration that he is absolute owner of the plaint schedule property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property with costs and other reliefs as deemed fit.

( 3 ) THE schedule property is described as portion of Survey No. 3 of Bommmanahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk, measuring one acre twenty eight guntas with boundaries given in the schedule with standing crops of horse-gram etc.

( 4 ) THE plaint averments are that the plaintiff and defendants 3 to 6 form members of a joint Hindu family and they possessed joint family properties of which the plaint schedule property is one and they inherited these properties from the plaintiff's grand-father Bovigooga who is shown as Bingooba in taluk and revenue records and who was the original bara




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top