R.RAMAKRISHNA
RADHAKRISHNA ESTATE, SIDDHAPUR, KODAGU DISTRICT – Appellant
Versus
MARY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short 'the act' ). Notice was ordered for the respondent and she is represented.
( 2 ) BY taking consent of the learned advocates, the appeal is heard on its merits and the following order is passed.
( 3 ) AN important question that requires determination in this appeal is: "whether the maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona is applicable to claims arising under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923?"
( 4 ) FOR proper appreciation of this question the brief facts of the case presented is as follows: one doreswamy who claimed to be a workman in the estate owned by the appellant has filed an application under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act before the commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, kodagu for the employment injury said to have been sustained on 21-2-1983 when he was employed by the appellant. When this application was pending the said doreswamy died a natural death. The respondent who is the wife of late doreswamy has continued proceedings on behalf of her husband which ultimately culminated in an award. The commissioner has awarded a sum of Rs. 6,720
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.