SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Kar) 266

H.N.TILHARI
BHAGAWAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
ROASENE JEROME D SOUZA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.I.BHATTA, M.R.SASHIDAR, S.SASTRY, U.L.NARAYAN RAO, VIGNESHWAR SHASTRY

HARI NATH TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is the defendant's second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for short 'c. p. c. ', challenging the judgment and decree dated june 23, 1984 delivered by 2nd additional civil judge, belgaum, in regular appeal No. 63 of 1983, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree of the trial court dated april 20th, 1982, delivered and given by the principal munsiff, belgaum, decreeing the plaintiff-respondent's claim for possession and mesne profits in regular suit (o. s. No. 291 of 1971 Mrs. Roasene Jerome D'souza v. Bhagawandas ).

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are that the plaintiff-respondent filed the above mentioned suit on 7-9-1971, against the defendant-appellant for decree of possession over the suit property as described in para-1 of the plaint and for a decree of mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 35/- per mensem from the date of suit till the delivery of actual possession. The plaintiffs case as per averments made in the plaint has been that the plaintiff-respondent purchased house property measuring 1392 square feet for a sum of Rs. 7,000/- on 27-7-1970, from chandrakumar balaji kamble and venkubai balaji

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top