SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Kar) 264

M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO, M.F.SALDANHA
NEW HOPE GRANITES, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
LOKANATH – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V.ACHARYA RAO, M.R.ACHARYA

M. F. SALDANHA, J.

( 1 ) WE need to prefix this judgment with the observation that instances of abject disregard of judicial orders at all levels seems to have become the order of the day as far as the State and public authorities are concerned giving rise to a virtual multiplication of unnecessary post decisional litigation which has almost reached epidemic proportions. The problem is not acute. It is not chronic, it is virtually malignant. The question that is legitimately being posed in this situation is as to whether the law has any teeth left and the present situation appears to have stemmed from the impression of the authorities, that the law has not only lost its teeth but also its gums! It is in these circumstances that it has become necessary for us to deal at some length with this issue because this High Court alone as of now is unnecessarily overburdened with almost three thousand contempt proceedings, which is a virtual national record.

( 2 ) AN impression is unfortunately current that in those of the cases where a judicial order does not specify a prescribed time-frame for implementation, that the authority can postpone it indefinitely and still canvass the plea that n


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top