N.D.V.BHATT
B. T. SAKKU – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 23-4-1993 passed by the XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City in O. S. No. 5988/ 1989. By the said judgment, the learned Additional City Civil Judge dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.
( 2 ) WHEN the matter has come up for admission, the learned Counsel on both sides submitted that the matter may be taken up for final disposal. It is under these circumstances, the appeal was taken up for final disposal.
( 3 ) THE facts relevant for the disposal of this appeal, briefly stated, are as under :plaintiff-APPELLANT filed the aforesaid suit before the lower Court praying for a judgment and decree declaring the preliminary notification hearing No. HC. PR. ALAO 389 BDA 76-77, dated 21-3-1977 and published in the official gazette dated 5-5-1977 and the final notification No. HUD/49/mnj/78, dated 14-5-1980 and published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 12-6-1980 so far as they relate to the suit schedule property are null and void and that the same do not bind the plaintiff in any manner and for permanent injuntion restraining the defendants from in any way interfering with the suit schedule proper
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.