SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 124

V.P.MOHAN KUMAR
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMED HANEEF – Respondent


Advocates:
Mahesh R.Uppin, S.P.SHANKAR

V. P. MOHAN KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE Insurance Company has filed this appeal against the award of compensation by the Workmen's Compensation commissioner with respect to an employment injury suffered by the claimant, namely, fracture of a bone of the leg while he was unloading manure.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are not in dispute. The worker has suffered a non-schedule injury is also not in dispute. The quantum of compensation payable has been assessed by the commissioner on the basis of assessment made by him relying ex. P-3. The contention of the appellant is that the worker has not produced any Medical Certificate estimating the loss of earning capacity suffered by the claimant, due to the accident. The question therefore raised and argued at length in the appeal is the right of the Adjudicating Authority to assess the quantum of compensation independently under Section 4 (1) (c) (i) of the workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

( 3 ) THE Counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal. According to him, the essence of the attack made by the appellant, relates to the quantum of compensation awarded and therefore, the insurer is not ent



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top