SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 154

G.C.BHARUKA
PAYAFPA JAKKAPPA WAGHE – Appellant
Versus
JAYAPAL SHRIPAL BADANEKAI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.VISHVESHVARA, RAVI S.BALIKAI

G. C. BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by the plaintiffs who had filed a suit in 1961 seeking a direction upon the defendants to close the pit or trenches dug up by them in-between their lands r. s. nos. 371/1 and 337/3 and also for restraining them from obstructing the plaintiffs from passing over those lands with their carts and catties. Though the suit was decreed by the trial court, but, the said judgment and decree has been reversed by the lower appellate court thereby dismissing the suit.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF nos. 1 and 2 are the owners of r. s, No. 375 and plaintiff nos. 3 and 4 are the owners of r. s. nos. 376/a and 376. According to the plaintiffs there is a way marked as 'abcdefghi' as shown in the plaintiffs' sketch map which leads from sadalaga village to the land of the plaintiffs. The said way as per the map passes through 27 survey numbers including survey nos. 371/1 and 377/3 owned by the defendants. Admittedly, only a part of the claimed way lying between the points g and h passes through the lands owned by the defendants. The owners of other survey numbers over which the said way is claimed to be passing have not been impleaded in the present suit. Accor









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top