SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 203

V.P.MOHAN KUMAR
M. D. NANAIAH – Appellant
Versus
K. NAGARAJU – Respondent


Advocates:
B.J.SOMAYAJI, K.N.SUBHA READY, SRINIVASA GOWDA

( 1 ) THESE four appeals arise out of the interlocutory orders passed by the Court below in two suits.

( 2 ) M. F. A. No. 469/95 and M. F. A. No. 470/95 are filed against the order passed on I. A. No. IV, by defendants Nos. 1 and 2 in O. S. No. 518/ 95. This is an application under Order 39, Rule 2a of the C. P. C. alleging violation of the order in I. A. No. 1 therein.

( 3 ) M. F. A. No. 471/5 is filed against the order passed on I. A. No. 1 in O. S. No. 848/ 95, by defendant No. 1 therein.

( 4 ) M. F. A. No. 472/95 is filed by defendants Nos. 1 and 2 against the order passed on I. A. No. III filed -in O. S. No. 518/95.

( 5 ) THE facts leading to the above appeals as alleged by the plaintiff is as follows: the 1st defendant in the suit "the Karnataka State Government Employees' Association" is an association registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act. It has its own rules and bye-laws to govern its affairs. On 29-10-1994, the elected President of the Association tendered his resignation. His term of office was to expire with 1997. According to the plaintiffs in the suit, the filling up of the Office of the President should be in accordance with Rule 14 (A) of the Ru

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top