SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 267

H.N.TILHARI
VOKKALIGARA SANNAPPA – Appellant
Versus
VOKKALIGARA ANNAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
P.GANAPATHY BHAT, T.S.AMAR KUMAR

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs second appeal from the judgment and decree dated 18-12-1984, passed by civil judge, madikeri, in regulr appeal No. 39 of 1980, whereby, the learned lower appellate court has reversed the judgment and decree dated 5-7-1980, passed by munsiff, virajpet, decreeing the plaintiffs claim in the original suit No. 148 of 1979 and after setting aside the trial court's decree allowed the defendant's appeal by dismissing the claim made by the plaintiff in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-appellant's case in brief is that the plaintiff-appellant in the present case, filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction restraining the defendants-respondents and their agents as well as the servants from interfering with the plaintiffs right and possession and enjoyment of suit property.

( 3 ) PLAINTIFFS case has been that he is in exclusive peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property in dispute more specifically described in the plaint schedule, as per exchange deed dated 25-11-1974, between the plaintiff on the one hand and Smt. P. G. Ponnawa and two others on the other hand, according to the plaintiffs case, plaintiff became the absolute owner






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top