SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 377

T.S.THAKUR
M. S. PALAKSHA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
N.P.SINGHVI, S.SHANTHAMALLAPPA

TIRATH S. THAKUR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in all these writ petitions are transport operators who have a common grievance to make. They contend that Police Officers who are checking their vehicles and demanding production of documents for commission of offences under the Motor Vehicles Act are not competent to do so nor do they check reports issued by them furnish a sound basis to the authorities for initiating any legal proceedings against them. They question the validity of the check reports and seek a writ of certiorari quashing the same besides a declaration to the effect that with the amendment of Section 130 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the Police Officers have ceased to have any power to check the vehicles in question or take any legal action or proceedings against the transport operators.

( 2 ) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

( 3 ) THE petitioners are entirely banking upon amendment to Section 130 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 in support of their case that the Police Officers have ceased to have any power to check their vehicles w. e. f. 14-11-1994 i. e. , the date the amendment came into force.

( 4 ) SECTION 130 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the same stoo











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top